That said, I was impressed at the number of ads and trackers Avira was able to block. When I ran exploit attack samples on all 3 web browsers, Avira let a lot of them through. However, Avira doesn’t have the best detection rate against exploit attacks. I installed it on all 3 web browsers and tried to visit over 50 phishing website samples listed on PhishTank - Avira could block every single sample, including those that the default protections on Chrome, Firefox, and Edge weren’t able to block. I was pretty impressed with the extension. The extension works on all major web browsers, including Chrome, Firefox, and Microsoft Edge. Visit Comodo Avira vs. Comodo: Web SecurityĪvira’s web extension scans for and blocks access to dangerous phishing websites, ads, and trackers. This is particularly disappointing when Avira managed to block every sample. I tested it by downloading the same malware sample archive, and Comodo could only block 90% of the samples. The real-time protection isn’t great, either. The scan took 3 hours to complete - which is much slower than Avira - and only found 93% of malware samples. However, Comodo’s scanner didn’t work very well on my computer. I downloaded the same malware archive containing 1,000s of malware samples that I used to test Avira, and ran Comodo’s full system scan. Again, Avira was able to detect and block every malware sample before they could cause damage to my computer.Ĭomodo uses heuristic analysis and a massive online malware database to scan your computer for malware. I tested it by downloading the same malware sample archive. The real-time protection worked well, too. Avira found and removed 100% of the malware samples on my computer, which is great. While it was running, I could use my computer normally, as Avira offloads the resource-intensive process to the cloud. I then ran Avira’s full system scan, which finished in about 40 minutes. To test Avira’s malware scanner, I downloaded an archive containing 1,000s of malware samples and hid them in different locations on my Windows 11 PC. I was really happy with the malware scanner’s performance. Avira’s malware scanner is so good that many third-party antiviruses such as TotalAV use it in their antivirus suites. Avira vs. Comodo: Malware ProtectionĪvira features an excellent malware scanner that uses both heuristic analysis and an extensive malware database to protect you from rootkits, worms, trojans, and more in 2023. If you want good web intrusion protection, go with Comodo. If you’re after one of the best antiviruses on the market, go with Avira.Ĭomodo has a better firewall. Comodo’s malware protection isn’t that great, but it does feature a good firewall. Avira has better malware protection, provides more useful features, and is more intuitive. Avira offers excellent malware protection and extra features on a budget.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |